What does Starbucks closing Teavana stores mean for specialty tea?

Starbucks announced it would close all 379 Teavana stores by spring 2018. Pic: Starbucks

Starbucks’ decision to shut down Teavana stores does not come as a surprise nor is it a bad sign for the specialty tea market, according to Charlie Cain who served as Teavana’s VP of concept development and franchising until January 2015. 

Starbucks announced that it will close its 379 mall-based Teavana stores during its Q2 earnings results last week, due to persistent underperformance and to focus on its core business of hand-crafted specialty tea and coffee beverages.

“While tea has consistently been among the fastest growing categories within Starbucks stores, maintaining Teavana as a stand-alone chain dedicated to bulk-tea and accessories proved to be a less efficient and profitable strategy for driving tea consumption and revenue,” Cain told BeverageDaily.

Cain is currently the principal and executive partner of brand consulting agency Building Oz in Seattle, Washington.

Specialty tea market still going strong

The shuttering of Teavana stores does not signal weakness in the specialty tea market, however, as it is growing at nearly twice the rate of the overall US tea business with millennials driving the growth, according to Cain. 

“Demographic trends suggest the industry has a long runway of expansion as younger consumers are more inclined to favor tea over coffee than their parents,” he said.

Consumers between the ages of 18 and 29 are evenly split between coffee and tea as their preferred beverage, Statista found. The number jumps to 62% of consumers between 45 and 64 years old who said they prefer coffee to tea and 70% of people above 65 and over prefer coffee to tea.

Why Teavana growth was limited

Teavana expanded from its first location as an independently owned teahouse in 1997, to hundreds of franchised locations when was acquired by Starbucks in 2012 for $620m.

“New stores saw dramatic early sales results, but sustained sales growth beyond seasonal gifting required consumers to shift their tea purchasing from the local grocery store to the regional mall. That’s not a behavior we see happening consistently in any other specialty food or beverage industry,” Cain said.

However, the early retail success of Teavana shops did not lend itself well to outside the mall environment because it would require significant changes to its business model, according to Cain.

“Teavana's success was as a novelty gift shop in high-traffic, Class-A shopping malls,” he said.

“This required a shift in brand positioning, product assortment, retail model and customer expectations that proved too difficult within the short timeframe expected.”

Leveraging Starbucks’ strength in hand-crafted beverages would also not be able to drive incremental sales within existing Teavana stores because of the limited space and food service equipment.

“Trying to add several hundred prepared beverage transactions per day on top of shoe-box sized stores that are built to process less than 100 $50 retail transactions proved exceptionally messy,” Cain said.

Teashops shouldn’t abandon the mall

The closing of Teavana stores allows other brands dedicated to specialty tea retail to take advantage of entering former Teavana mall locations, Cain pointed out.

Mall shopping also drives half of US retail sales with 75% of Americans visiting a mall at least once a month creating opportunity for impulse purchases, according to the Journal of Shopping Center Research. 

“This announcement presents a tremendous opportunity for David’s Tea and other brands who may have been blocked out of the best locations by Teavana’s non-compete clauses with landlords,” he added.

Starbucks said it would close the majority of its Teavana stores by Spring 2018 and current employees will receive apply for positions at Starbucks stores as the company is on track to create 68,000 new jobs in the US over the next five years. 

Teavana's premium RTD tea line will continue to be sold in the US as part of its partnership with AB InBev and Starbucks. 

Related News

Pic:iStock/milosljubicic

Making tea trendy: How can the category appeal to millennials?

Tetley on the future of tea

The future of tea: From hangover cures to tea jellies, Tetley’s top five predictions

Among the list of top superfoods for 2017 is green tea, but the whole tea category has a lot of room for innovation, Pollock Communications president said. ©iStock/lzf

Tea will take off in sales and popularity in 2017 and beyond, says survey

While the RTD market is growing, the dominance of Gold Peak and Pure Leaf has made it difficult for smaller brands to compete. Photo: Pepsi and Coca-Cola

Opportunities for tea: RTD, Millennials, and office services

Comments (2)

Anonymous - 06 Aug 2017 | 07:04

Sluggish sales are no surprise

Teavana employees seem to be paid to socialize amongst themselves rather than sell product. When I frequent a store, I feel as though I interrupting a gathering and forcing them to work. They hover and chat around the cash register waiting to ring a sale up. Teavana needs people with sale experience.

06-Aug-2017 at 07:04 GMT

Adrienne Franco - 04 Aug 2017 | 03:42

Ms.

Anyone with half a brain knows the reason Teavana stores were underperformers is because they were way overpriced! Yeah the tea is good , but an 8 ounce can of Peach Bellini loose tea at $45 is a bit pricey! I bought the tea, a small 8 oz bag of their rock sugar and a diffuser and it cost me $76.00! I think Teavana put themselves out of business!

04-Aug-2017 at 03:42 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.