Cook County soda tax due to take effect today

The Cook County soda tax is expected to generate more than $200m next year, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue. ©iStock/OcusFocus

A penny-per-ounce Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois, goes into effect today after a temporary restraining order on the levy was dismissed in Cook County Circuit Court. However, retailers have announced they will continue their fight against the tax.

The Illinois Retail Merchants Association (IRMA) had succeeded in obtaining a temporary delay in the implementation of the tax (originally due to come into effect on July 1); but on Friday last week a judge dismissed the lawsuit. 

However, late yesterday the IRMA announced that it has filed an appeal on the court's decision to dismiss the lawsuit. 

Judge deems tax within county's authority

Last week Cook County Circuit Court Judge Daniel Kubasiak ruled that the Sweetened Beverage Tax was within the county’s authority based on Article VII of the Illinois Constitution, which allows local governments to “exercise any power and perform any function pertaining to its government and affairs including, but not limited to, the power to regulate for the protection of public health.”

“The only question and duty before this court is to determine if the merchants have set forth sufficient substance in the verified complaint to withstand the county’s motion to dismiss,” Kubasiak said.

“The court concludes that the merchants have not, and that the county’s motion to dismiss must be granted."

The judge's decision came after the Illinois Retail Merchants Association (IRMA) was granted a temporary restraining order a few days before the soda tax was originally set to go into effect on July 1, 2017. IRMA argued that the regulations of Sweetened Beverage Tax were too vague, leaving retailers vulnerable to tax penalties.

The IRMA had been considering the legal options since the judge's decision to dismiss: saying in a statement last week that “While we are disappointed by the judge’s ruling to dismiss the Cook County sweetened beverage tax last Friday, we continue to weigh our legal options to find the best path to move forward.”

"The exposure to lawsuits should not been taken lightly," IRMA president and CEO, Rob Karr, told BeverageDaily last week. "We’ve seen that occur in other tax areas where the government's already laid out their regulations, we’re following them, and we still get sued."

Late yesterday the IRMA announced it would fight the judge's motion to dismiss its lawsuit.

"We have filed an appeal on the Circuit Court's decision to grant Cook County's Motion to Dismiss the Sweetened Beverage Tax lawsuit. Looking forward to our day in court," it said via a statement on its social media pages.

A protest opposing the soda tax is also scheduled to be held in the city of Chicago today.

What’s included and what’s exempt

The tax is to apply to any ready-to-drink sweetened non-alcoholic beverage, carbonated or non-carbonated, that contains a caloric or non-caloric sweetener such as regular and diet sodas. Sweetened drinks from beverage-dispensing machines will also be taxed, according to the ordinance.

The tax does not include beverages consisting of 100% natural fruit or vegetable juice or beverages in which a dairy alternative such as soy, almond, or rice milks make up more than 50% of the drink or is the first ingredient listed. Infant formula and any liquid sold as a nutritional meal replacement or for weight loss purposes will not be taxed.

Syrups or sweetened powders used as an ingredient to create an at-home sweetened beverage are also exempt from the tax.

Easing state debt

Revenue from the Sweetened Beverage Tax is projected to bring in $67.5m this year and $200.6m in 2018 helping alleviate the state’s mounting debt. More than 300 employees were laid off last month in Cook County as a result of the state’s budget crisis.

The delay in the soda tax implementation cost the county $17m in revenue, according to Cook County board president, Toni Preckwinkle.

“I regret that these actions are necessary – and I deeply regret the impact they have on individual employees. One of the main reasons I proposed the modest tax on sweetened beverages last year was specifically to avoid these kind of cuts,” Preckwinkle added.

Related News

Photo: iStock/SeanPavonePhoto

Taxed beverage sales drop in Philadelphia, rise in its suburbs. Is it going as planned?

Philadelphia has seen declines in soda sales after one month following the roll out of it 1.5-cent-per-ounce tax on sweetened beverages.  ©iStock/piotr_malczyk

Does a soda tax work? Philadelphia gains $5.7m in tax revenue and sees drop in soda drinking

Seattle is set to make a final vote on a 1.75-cent-per-ounce soda tax next Monday, according to the city council. ©iStock/ashleymatheny

Seattle soda tax moves to final vote after dropping diet soda from proposed plan

Cook County's proposed sweetened beverage tax is on hold until at least July 12, 2017. ©iStock/RubenLammerink

Cook County soda tax temporarily stalled after resistance from retailers over ‘vague’ rules

Comments (2)

chris - 07 Aug 2017 | 07:46


should fight this or they will tax everything with sugar in it. Sugar is not good for health. A modest tax would be 10 cents for a soda doubling the price is unreal. Folks on food stamps don't have to pay the tax, aren't those the people who health this is primarily aimed for?

07-Aug-2017 at 19:46 GMT

Patti - 02 Aug 2017 | 07:36

Sugar Tax is a Joke

Cook County does not care about the health of people. They are taxing Sugar to put more money in their pockets. Hence the name Crook County. The State of Illinois, City of Chicago and Crook County all have Politicians running the state, city and county. We DO NOT have public servants here, we have thieves. Again, sugar does not make people fat, pure laziness does!!!

02-Aug-2017 at 19:36 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.