News in brief

Attorney: First round to POM at the Supreme Court, but don't expect the floodgates to open...

Jeffrey Brown: POM still has to prove its case in the district courts, and it won't be easy

POM Wonderful scored a big win on Thursday after the Supreme Court gave it the green light to sue juice rival Coca-Cola for false advertising. But don't expect the floodgates to open with scores of similar lawsuits, says one attorney.

Jeffrey Brown, a partner in the Chicago office of law firm Michael Best & Friedrich, told FoodNavigator-USA: "POM's case against Coca-Cola was originally filed in 2008. It's now 2014, and it's not even over yet.

"Now the case [POM alleges Coke misled consumers by marketing a Minute Maid juice comprised almost entirely of apple and grape juice as ‘Pomegranate Blueberry'] will go back to the district courts, where POM will still have to prove its case, and that won't be easy. 

"POM has to prove not just that the label was misleading, but to prove injury, which resulted in damage to POM, so there is still a long way to go here."

These cases are extremely expensive and time consuming

He added: "These cases [where competitors sue each other under the Lanham Act alleging false advertising] are extremely expensive and time consuming. And there is always the element of tit for tat. If you sue a rival, they might sue you. 

"Most of them are addressed with letter writing campaigns or resolved through the National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, and I don't really see that changing. This [Supreme Court opinion] is good news for POM but I don't see the floodgates opening."

As to the broader implications of the Supreme Court opinion on juice labeling in particular, it all depends on whether POM ultimately prevails, which is by no means obvious, he said.

In the meantime, companies should already be thinking about whether their labels are false or misleading in their entirety, aside from whether they are strictly compliant with juice labeling regs in the federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, he said, so if they are already doing that, "this doesn't really change the landscape."

Click HERE and HERE to get more legal reaction to the Supreme Court opinion.

 

Related News

Experts advise supplement companies to carefully review labels in wake of POM ruling

Experts advise supplement companies to carefully review labels in wake of POM ruling

Reasonable consumers might assume that this product contains primarily cranberry & pomegranate juice, say the plaintiffs. But they would be wrong

Walmart sued over juice labels; echoes of POM Wonderful v Coke?

The juice blend at the heart of all this legal wrangling was discontinued in late 2014 following disappointing sales

Coca-Cola suffers setback in juice labeling lawsuit

POM: "This is a real victory for consumers"

POM v Coke at Supreme Court: Food marketers be warned, if your labels are FDA compliant or not, you're fair game

POM Wonderful scores ‘resounding victory’ at Supreme Court: But what does it mean for your label?

POM Wonderful scores ‘resounding victory’ at Supreme Court: But what does it mean for your label?

Related Products

See more related products

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.